Dark Mode
An immigration lawyer with a client​
Immigration News

Businesses Confront Expanding Immigration Enforcement While Navigating Legal Exposure: How Employers Can Respond Strategically

A Shifting Enforcement Landscape for American Employers

Across the United States, businesses of all sizes are now central players in an immigration enforcement environment marked by rapid escalation and deep public scrutiny. In Minneapolis, where DHS describes its latest activity as its largest operation ever, hotels, restaurants and retail establishments have temporarily closed amid protests and heightened fear.

Following the fatal shooting of ICU nurse Alex Pretti by US Border Patrol, more than sixty Minnesota executives signed a public letter calling for deescalation, though notably without directly referencing immigration enforcement. That omission reflects the complex position employers occupy: balancing legal exposure, employee well-being and community expectations.

For businesses nationwide, this moment demands preparation rather than reaction.

Understanding What Immigration Agents May Do Inside a Business

The AP report confirms that immigration agents may freely enter any public-facing portion of a business without a warrant, including sales floors, dining rooms, parking lots and front-office spaces. Once inside these areas, agents may question individuals, obtain information and conduct arrests.

However, nonpublic spaces remain subject to stricter constitutional protections. Areas such as employee-only kitchens, stockrooms or administrative offices require a judicial warrant signed by a judge. This cannot be substituted by an administrative warrant, which is issued internally by immigration authorities. The internal ICE memo referenced in the article, suggesting administrative warrants could justify forced home entry in some circumstances, has raised serious constitutional concerns among immigration attorneys.

This distinction between public and private space is essential for employers seeking to create legally sound enforcement-response protocols.

How Federal Enforcement Is Increasing Pressure on Employers

Beyond high-profile arrests, federal authorities are amplifying workplace scrutiny through I-9 audits. Immigration attorneys nationwide have reported an increase in ICE agents physically arriving at businesses to initiate these audits. Traditionally, audits began with mailed notices rather than in-person visits involving tactical gear and law enforcement presence.

Although employers legally have three business days to respond to an I-9 inspection, the manner in which agents now deliver notices can create confusion and a sense of urgency that may lead to missteps.

This shift demonstrates the importance of internal preparation long before ICE appears at the door.

Clarifying Employer Rights During an ICE Encounter

Even during active enforcement, businesses retain critical rights. If officers do not have a judicial warrant, employers may restrict access to private areas and may request that agents leave the premises entirely. Some companies have adopted clearer signage designating private spaces, while others have implemented training for managers who may be the first point of contact with law enforcement.

However, as Minnesota practitioners note, ICE may continue activities despite such requests, making it essential for employers to adopt a preventive legal strategy rather than relying solely on real-time instructions.

Public Expectations and Corporate Responsibility in an Intensifying Climate

Large employers in Minnesota and across the country are confronting pressure not only from federal authorities but also from the public, labor groups and advocacy organizations. Viral videos showing federal agents detaining two Target employees prompted widespread calls for stronger corporate statements. Although Target’s incoming CEO acknowledged the emotional toll recent violence has had on the workforce, the company has not directly addressed immigration enforcement.

Other companies, including Home Depot and Hilton, have also been urged to comment on enforcement occurring at or near their locations. Worker organizations, such as the Culinary Union and the United Auto Workers, have publicly criticized what they view as a widening pattern of overreach that harms local economies, tourism-dependent industries and working families.

The broader business community increasingly recognizes that enforcement activity can depress foot traffic, contribute to labor shortages and disrupt regional economic stability.

How Spar & Bernstein Can Help Businesses Respond Proactively

In an environment where enforcement may occur without warning, businesses benefit from legal strategies that anticipate federal scrutiny and protect both their operations and their workforce. The immigration attorneys at Spar & Bernstein offer tailored support in key areas:

  • I-9 Compliance and Internal Audits
    A proactive review of employment documentation helps minimize exposure before any federal contact occurs.
  • Enforcement Response Protocols
    We help businesses structure clear, legally compliant procedures covering who interacts with agents, how to request warrants and how to document interactions.
  • Risk Assessments for Workforce and Operations
    Employers can identify vulnerabilities and develop mitigation strategies that preserve continuity while reducing liability.
  • Employee Rights Education and Internal Communication
    Clear guidance reduces fear, confusion and operational disruptions during enforcement activity.
  • Legal Representation During Audits and Investigations
    From Notices of Inspection to potential fines, counsel is essential for achieving the best possible outcome.

Through comprehensive planning and responsive representation, Spar & Bernstein helps businesses maintain stability, ensure compliance and uphold their obligations to their employees and communities.

Turning Legal Pressure Into Strategic Preparedness

The AP News report illustrates a rapidly changing enforcement environment, one that requires clarity, preparation and experienced legal guidance. Employers who invest in proactive compliance and establish enforcement-response structures place themselves in the strongest position to safeguard both their business and their workforce. The attorneys at Spar & Bernstein stand ready to guide companies through this evolving landscape with practical, solutions-oriented strategies.

Businesses Confront Expanding Immigration Enforcement While Navigating Legal Exposure: How Employers Can Respond Strategically